Stablecoins are on the rise, and they are filling a void for the burgeoning tokenized economy. A void created by unintended consequences of the cryptocurrency success story; they incentivize trading and investing at the expense of use as a medium of exchange. A common conundrum faced by crypto owners who believe that a price surge is around the corner is – do I hold, or do I spend? The crypto movement has created an active community of holders. As the community feverishly works to resolve the scaling problem and bring transaction volume closer to par with Visa, we are still left with tokens that some are reluctant to use as a medium of exchange. While this may be temporary – as decentralized cryptocurrencies evolve, it certainly poses a challenge for projects that rely upon a stable value token to facilitate transactions today. Stablecoins offer a solution that promises to enable some projects in the tokenized economy to gain traction. These centralized solutions, however, are not without quirks that may render them undesirable under certain circumstances. A stablecoin is essentially a token, such as bitcoin, on a blockchain – but one that is pegged to a state-issued currency such as the U.S. Dollar, where one token equals one dollar. This stable value token can be purchased with fiat currency or cryptocurrency. It can be redeemed at any time for the underlying currency on which it is based. You can think of stablecoin as the tokenization of fiat currency, a digital proxy for cash, or a cash-collateralized token. Tokens offer several benefits over the underlying currency. To name a few: as a proxy for fiat currency – they can be as reliable as the dollar, they are not vulnerable to counterfeit like paper money, they can be used in smart contracts to transfer value without